The Leaderless Movement of Occupy Wall Street in the United States

Occupy Wall Street has come back. The news about it has been massively been spread all over the social media networks. The occupation of Wall Street has been able to become a national issue. Lots of people pay attention to this movement even the president, celebrities and also street vendors. The controversy is made by one and only, the leaderless movement of Occupy Wall Street.

Who are They?
You must be curious about the movements done by these people under Occupy Wall Street. Due to its popularity, the video game on the Occupy has been developed. There also has been a talk about the movement, that is, to occupy the world. To know about who these people are and what they are demanding so far, you need to understand what the movement is.

As mentioned by the activists of the Occupy, this movement has set a clear concept. It is a leaderless movement with no authoritative set of demands. They don’t set any projected outcomes, talking heads, or bottom lines. The members of the Occupy are all the leaders. The statement that we are all leaders have been able to give the clear praxis as well as the clear history on the movement.

The Movements

The Movements
In 1960s and also in 70s, the movement has held a meeting on the focus on the feminism where there has been an issue on several forms of women oppression in private. Women were tired of being excluded from the inner circles of the leaderships. They have then focused on the issue of the gender equality in the formal leadership.

The awareness has also been raised in relation with the gay right. The movement has been able to empower the gay women and men to fight for the rights and also to get rid of the degraded life of the sexual privacy.

These two movements have been able to bring significant impacts to the American lives. The feminism has changed how we look at each other whether we are men or women. The gay rights have been able to free our sexuality. All these impacts have nothing to do with the https://multibet88.club centralized leadership.

In this movement, there are no leaders with long standing delegates as each of them is the leader. The Occupy operates in simple way, the members are being unified with one powerful goal, that is, all of them don’t tolerate the corruption and the greed.

Therefore, the leaderless movement of Occupy Wall Street will keep on fighting the unjust that happens in Wall Street.

The Irony and Influence of Occupy Wall Street

This year marks the 7th anniversary of this Wall Street social and economic movement. Occupy Wall Street or OWS was born in 2011 while US was under financial crisis. This movement has brought serious discussion to table. With the anniversary, US citizens start to look at how this movement has become.

The Influence of OWS
Bringing up many critical issues like inequality in salary, job vacancies, and many other social and economic issues, OWS has spread some progressive and positive energy to the society. This energy is very welcoming, very intoxicating for people’s emotional side, and organically grassroots.

The influence is very positive as well. It encourages people to voice what is unheard before. As an effect, these issues are on the table of discussions on the highest level of the country. The win of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez shares the same theme of this movement. From this side, we find positive effects from this movement.

The Irony of OWS

The Irony of OWS
Everyone needs to agree that this movement voice out issues like money out of politics and income inequality. Yet, this movement has flaws. Despite its positive influence, OWS doesn’t have an organization to manage the movement and to direct it better. It is also lack of hierarchy which makes this movement weaker.

Without making specific demand during the protest, OWS doesn’t perform ultimately as they are potentially be. It doesn’t make the system changes fast and big enough. Of course, it is something they can fix, and these flaws aren’t failures.

OWS held an anniversary event in September 17 this year in Zucotti Park. For the last seven years, this movement inspired other social and economic movements, and brought positive impact to the people. Yet, if they don’t fix the irony, it is just a matter of time before this movement remains a history.

OWS is Continued

Have you ever heard OWS? This is a mass protest that cries about the economic condition in the US. This protest began in 2011 and actually, OWL is continued even up to now. They still protest the same thing, the uneven condition in the US.

• The Clash between the Mass and the Police
Actually, the mass just wanted a peaceful protest by camped near Wall Street and one block away from World Trade Centre. They only come with posters and perform a kind of art performance in order to attract other people’s attention and join them. However, the police wrongly saw this as a disturbance.

Then, several people were caught and jailed for a certain period of time. This gave a big deep scar for many people who join the mass. However, this didn’t stop them to continue the Occupy Wall Street movement.

• Citizen Expressions of Many Oppression in the US
Year by year, OWS becomes the chance for the US citizens to perform their expressions about any issues in the US. Besides of economy and social issues, they also speak out the black oppressions since there are so many coloured people join the mass.

This movement has been the language of US citizens in order to convey the protest. They have a long march and even camp. They also stand in the front of the police barricade and give the same strong message that they want democracy, the real one, back in the US. They hope that they will not only get their right to have an even economic condition but also their right to live equally without seeing the colours or backgrounds.

This act is really catching the world’s attention and that is why OWL is continued. They want to be heard by the government. Although some of them already experienced the bad things from this protest, they still go forward and shout “We are the 99%”.

Koninklijke Philips N.V. versus Bureau of Intellectual Property (2016) – Supreme Court Decision Number 2877/2559

The Thai Supreme Court has turned around the Trademark Registrar’s choice to dismiss a blemish on the grounds of closeness, expounding on the need to deliberately consider the particular way of the focused on merchandise while deciding comparability.

In this 2016 choice, the Thai Supreme Court took the position that the contrasting way of merchandise, however comparative, assumes a critical part in choosing the probability of perplexity between two imprints.

Koninklijke Philips N.V. (Petitioner), connected for the trademark “PHILIPS” in class 21 (for different family unit electronic machines, including electric toothbrushes). The application was dismisses by the Trademark Registrar and the Trademark Appeal Board on the grounds of the similitude of the check connected for to an outsider’s earlier enrolled stamp, i.e. “DR.PHILLIPS and Device” in class 21 (for toothbrushes and dental floss). The Claimant advanced the choice to the Intellectual Property and International Trade (IPIT) Court, which found for the Claimant. The Department of Intellectual Property engaged the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court isolated the likeness thought into two parts:

intrinsic likeness as far as visual portrayal, etymological organization and articulation of the individual imprints; and

the likelihood of such closeness bringing about buyer disarray with regards to the starting points of the particular products at issue.

As far as the second segment, the Court considered the sorts of the particular products and the cover of their business sectors (channels of exchange) in the brains of customers and general society’s impression of the separate merchandise.

It was watched the Claimant spends significant time in the family unit electric apparatuses area, has showcased its electric machines in Thailand since 1951, and has been utilizing the “PHILIPS” stamp for those items in Thailand since 1991.

The Court found that, despite the fact that the “PHILIPS” check has been utilized as a part of connection to a wide assortment of Claimant’s items other than electric toothbrushes, that reality does not give the Claimant a privilege – under the legitimate simultaneous utilize arrangement of the Thai Trademark Act (Section 27) – to be enrolled as the proprietor of the “PHILIPS” stamp for the products recorded in the application being referred to. In any case, the Court indicated people in general everywhere knows the “PHILIPS” check distinguishes the Claimant for the most part as the source of family unit electric products and this reality permits shoppers to promptly comprehend the Claimant makers the particular electric toothbrushes being referred to.

Advance, the Court watched electric toothbrushes have a place in the classification of electric apparatuses. It expressed the buy of electric toothbrushes requires a specific level of care and thought by buyers, especially as far as security and moderateness, and this thus expands the shot of shoppers coming into contact with the Claimant’s image, and increasing further comprehension of the item’s starting point.

Subsequently, the Supreme Court finished up a low likelihood existed of buyer perplexity between the imprints, and the choice of the IPIT Court was maintained.

CSUN understudies push for plastic water bottle boycott

Understudies supporter to wipe out the utilization of plastic water bottles on grounds through the “Boycott the Bottle” development.

Genna Gold, a senior, got the thought from her manageability 401 class in which understudies concocted ventures they were keen on.

Gold said the first objective to evacuate plastic water bottles off grounds would be best to replace with a thermos.

“In the wake of conversing with the University Corporation we understood that plastic water containers are their top vender,” Gold said. “It takes a great deal to assemble the start of a development, so we are setting up the foundation for next semester’s class to assume control it.”

With a specific end goal to get this development in full movement, Gold said they will require a considerable measure of understudy support.

One of the occasions that brings issues to light toward the development highlights “Tapped,” a film that shows understudies the negative impacts that solitary utilize plastic water bottles have on the planet, as indicated by Gold.

Joel Gutierrez, a PC data innovation understudy, said he needs individuals to know how destructive plastic containers are.

“I need individuals to comprehend that all the plastic restrains being utilized on grounds that end in the junk are burned, which at last returns to hurt everybody in the event that you don’t reuse,” Gutierrez said.

As indicated by Gutierrez, the Institute for Sustainability has likewise bolstered this development, which plans to bring issues to light on grounds.

“Our primary objective is to get the word out, not to totally boycott the container, since we have conversed with individuals around grounds and it would be truly difficult to do that here, at this moment,” Gutierrez said.

What’s more, Gold said she figured out how different grounds have gone completely bottle free by the support of understudies as it were.

“In the event that you have control i[n] numbers, you can basically complete anything that you need, so we are truly attempting to manufacture only the information how terrible water jugs are,” Gold said.

Austin Eriksson, manageability program supervisor at Facilities Planning, Design, and Construction (FPDC), said he supposes it is an extraordinary thought and understudies ought to continue pushing this development.

“Clearly single utilize plastic containers are not exceptionally reasonable, there is still request around here for our understudy, staff, workforce, the CSUN people group all in all, for packaged drinks,” Eriksson said.

Eriksson said he is extremely confident for this development since this is the uttermost a gathering of understudies have made a move on this matter.

“Prohibiting the water container would be incredible for the grounds yet it’s simply an issue of figuring how to do it and ensuring we aren’t influencing the grounds badly,” Eriksson said.